the science of knowing sciences.


IS the science of knowing sciences.

It seeks to embrace the sciences of humanities and clarification of knowledge itself.


An applied religious philosophy

developed by L. Ron Hubbard

dealing with the study of knowledge,

which through the application of its technology

can bring about desirable changes

in the conditions of life.

(Taken from the Latin word scio,

knowing in the fullest sense of the word,

and the Greek word logos, to study.)

A body of knowledge which, when properly used,

give freedom and truth to the individual.”

The investigation tech and its tools are needed at this point of the game. In the Church of Miscavige in fact there are already too many alterations, arbitraries and lies.


The Church of Scientology today doesn’t allow

their members to fully apply

the condition of DOUBT

as layed down by L.Ron Hubbard.

Steps 1 and 2 would require enough contact

with the independent person or group outside

the Church to really understand

what they are doing and how they are.



This contact not only are considered illegal,

a complicity to the ‘suppressor’

and as such are frowned upon but are also considered

a crime which has very serious consequences

on the parishioners progress on the bridge.

So while of course it is your personal decision

what you will do in the future, your responsibility

in doing so covers ALL dynamics.

If this is simply too much for you,

nobody will condemn you, but then stay aware


and don’t attest to it.


Hubbard said:  “Logic 14 Factors

introduced into a problem which do not derive from natural law but only from authoritarian command aberrate that problem or solution.


...Analyzing data, NOT a datum, groups, NOT a group.


The Condition of Doubt

by L. Ron Hubbard

When one cannot make up one’s mind as to an individual, a group, organization or project, a Condition of Doubt exists.

The formula is:

1. Inform oneself honestly of the actual intentions and activities of that group, project or organization, brushing aside all bias and rumor.

2. Examine the statistics of the individual, group, project or organization.

3. Decide on the basis of “the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics” whether or not it should be attacked, harmed or suppressed or helped.

4. Evaluate oneself or one’s own group, project or organization as to intentions and objectives.

5. Evaluate one’s own or one’s group, project or organization’s statistics.

6. Join or remain in or befriend the one which progresses toward the greatest good for the greatest number of dynamics and announce the fact publicly to both sides.

7. Do everything possible to improve the actions and statistics of the person, group, project or organization one has remained in or joined.

8. Suffer on up through the conditions in the new group if one has changed sides, or the conditions of the group one has remained in, if wavering from it has lowered one’s status.

… As Marty Rathbun wrote today;


“I have been working steadily and will continue to along the following lines in order to make the attainment of that statement of purpose possible:

  1. Differentiate the subject of Scientology from the Church of Scientology.
  2. Differentiate L Ron Hubbard from David Miscavige.
  3. Sort out confusions in the murky 81-pt period as to what is Scientology and what are clever alterations intended to reverse its potential.  Despite what some vehemently assert – and rather accusastively toward those actually working to sort it out – LRH Tech compilations were many years behind LRH’s advices for updates (see Joe Howard’s article at for more detail). So, that is no easy task. And no, it won’t get done by an internet discussion group attended by any Tom, Dick or C of M plant having an undirected free for all.
  4. Make LRH tech broadly available so as to make Ron’s postulate that “the work was free” stick.  Which is my proof that my intentions as to #3 are untainted by financial or status considerations.
  5. Make it safe to practice Scientology outside the wall.”


we are here to help!!


If you still in the church staff or public and you need help to get out, if you just left and you need help, please call or write to:


Silvia  Kusada  e-mail:


Aida Thomas: e-mail:


contact Aida Thomas in private.



Silvia Kusada


Class VI (SHSBC), Class IV C/S and OT 7.



  1. you are absolutely right.

    they don’t allow you to get the other side of the story, hence the sp declares and forced disconnection etc.

    they assume they have a monopoly on your soul and you have no where to go but free, like the eternal damnation, you will go to hell if you don’t change your ways and follow our orders.

    that’s suppressive and as a group they stopped operating as ot’s a long time ago.

    you have to get both sides in order to do a proper doubt formula. otherwise you will always be in lowers. this way, they just keep putting their students and pc’s into confusion, they just invalidate stable datums and spin the pc/student around to 8-c them up the bridge but in life those same pcs/students aren’t doing well so they keep going to their church for help to do better and so the cycle continues until the pc/student is down that dwindling spiral in life and then they kick you to the curb for you have out lived your usefulness meaning money to that organization.

    and if you’re clear then they key in your ot3 case which makes the overwhelm even more difficult to deal with for some. The others, we rise to the occasion and love the fight 🙂

    alot of those sp declares are bullshit.

    they have one viewpoint, it’s our way or the highway and with that, i say i’ll take the highway cause your way is the way to death and i prefer life.

  2. You make a good point, Sylvia.

    For me the doubt formula presents itself as a zen koan….a paradox that has no answer. For if you “find out who you really are” in the previous formula then all you have to do is be yourself and the details will take care of themselves. That is to say, you’ll naturally gravitate to those things which align with you and you’ll let go of those that don’t…unless you turn off your inner knowing (which I’ve been known to do). And as for suffering up the conditions… blows to the enemy and asking permission to join the group…. if you insist 😉

    Thanks for letting me post here. I know for some my perspectives are out in left field. Having immersed myself in the lower conditions many times at least I speak from experience.


  3. I think the individual must make the choice. It’s true that church members will steer you away from looking (and that right there is an outpoint), but a person must “keep his own counsel” and make his decision on what he knows.

    I am currently doing a doubt formula and I’m willing to look despite the suppression from church terminals that tell me “Don’t look.”

    Thanks for the post. Very insightful.

    • Thank you for reading and posting on my blog.
      If you ever decided to go back to the Church of $, it would be interesting to see what you have to go through or do in order to be accepted as part of the group again… it might be good data for somebody else’s doubt formula…
      Know that I admire you for doing this.
      I think LRH would be proud of you… he never liked sheeps.

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • August 2010
    M T W T F S S
    « Jul   Sep »
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 102 other followers