From regging cycles “Coffee Shop Auditing Style” to the HGC’s Out Tech.”

.

You probably would enjoy as much as I did

this little story from Mr. Smith.

As a note;

If you still in the church please educate

the staffs into using the proper  two-way comm cycle,

as reported in the below HCOBs.

 

Today if you refer a Staff member to a HCOB, he most likely will ask you what it is?...

Here is the story:

On day MR. Smith was asked to join Staff.

He politely responded with a ‘NO’.

Of course the recruiter couldn’t let go…

and so insisted and asked ‘WHY’?

MR. Smith, a well-trained auditor,

looked at the guy and with good TR’s answered him:

 

...

“You are not going to make me list a question

that does not read on me,

and you are NOT going to give me an item, either,

from a non reading listing question.”

 

….

Now, think of all the times you were told you were out-ethics

because you did not donate more,

or you did not contribute or agreed

or you were asked why you were in that situation,

or what did you do to pull it in…

This is, today standard in the Church of $cientology.

.

Knowing the tech

.

“REACTION

.

NOTHING PRODUCES AS MUCH CASE UPSET

AS A WRONG LIST ITEM OR A WRONG LIST.

… wrong list reactions.

(…)  he blows up or goes into apathy. Or blows. Or attacks the auditor.

ALL of the more violent or bad reactions on the part of the pc

come from out-lists.

Nothing else produces such a sharp deterioration in a case or even illness.

.

OUT-LISTS

Therefore, when one gets a sharp change in a case

(like lowered tone, violence, blows, (…) long notes from pcs, self-C/Sing, etc., etc.),

the C/S SUSPECTS AN OUT-LIST.

This outness can occur in regular sessions (…)

It can occur in “coffee shop” (out-of-session auditing of someone)

or (…) poorly trained or untrained staff members

or even in life.”

.

L. Ron Hubbard

HCOB 20 April 1972 Issue II C/S Series 78

PRODUCT PURPOSE AND WHY

AND W/C ERROR CORRECTION

…………

..

“DON’T USE A LISTING QUESTION IN TWO-WAY COMM.”

By a “listing question” is meant any question

which directly or indirectly calls for items in the pc’s answer.

Use of “who,” “what,” “which,”

instantly turns a two-way comm into a listing question.

(…)

If you use a listing question accidentally in two-way comm,

you can get the same bad reactions from a pc

that you would get on a wrongly done list.

 

...

The reason for pc upsets in two-way comm is hidden,

as it is not apparently a listing process,

rarely gets the correction a bad list would get.

Asking “who” or “what” or “which” during a two-way comm

after the main question can also turn it into a listing and nulling process.

Two-way comm questions MUST be limited

to feelings, reactions, significances.

They must NEVER ask for terminals or locations.

EXAMPLE: “Who upset you?” in two-way comm

causes the pc to give items.

This is a LIST.

“What are you upset about?” does the same thing.

“Which town were you happiest in?”

is also a LISTING question,

NOT a two-way comm question.

Any of these result in the pc giving items.

They are not then nulled or correctly indicated.

The pc can get VERY upset just

as he would with a wrong list.

Yet the session is not a “listing session”

so never gets corrected.

EXAMPLE: “How are you doing lately?”

is an example of a correct two-way comm question.

It gets off charge and gets no list items.

“Are you better these days than you used to be?”

“How have you been since the last session?”

“What happened” is different than

“What illness,” “What person,” “What town,”

which are listing questions.

.

The REPAIR

When other things fail to locate the upset of a pc

look into two-way comm processes in the folder

and treat them as L&N processes

where the pc has answered with items.

The relief is magical.

 

...

 

L. RON HUBBARD

HCO BULLETIN OF 17 MARCH 1974

TWO- WAY  COMM, USING WRONG QUESTIONS

…….

TWO-WAY COMM,

(Technical Dictionary)

1.

the precise technology of a process

used to clarify data with another for the other.

It is not chatter.

It is governed by the rules of auditing.

It is used by supervisors to clear up blocks to a person’s progress in study,

on post, in life or in auditing. It is governed by the communication cycle as

discovered in Scn. (HCOB 19 Jun 71 111)

2.

is an inquiry of the pc as to what

is going on and an invitation to him to look at it,

and that is all. (SH Spec 43, 6108C22)

 

...

3.

a two-way cycle of communication would work as follows:

Joe, having originated a communication, and having completed it,

may then wait for Bill to originate a communication to Joe,

thus completing the remainder of the two-way cycle of communication.

Thus we get the normal cycle of a communication

between two terminals. (Dn 55!, p. 84)

4.

the cycle is Cause, Distance, Effect,

with Effect then becoming Cause

and communicating across a distance to the original Source,

which is now Effect and this we call a two-way communication.

(Dn 55!, p. 64) Abbr. 2WC or TWC.)

 

.
.
 

.

.

.

WE ARE HERE TO HELP!!

.


If you are still in the church as staff or as public

and you need help to get out,

if you just left and you need help,

please call or write to:

ITALIANO/ENGLISH:

Silvia  Kusada  e-mail: SKusada2010@gmail.com

ESPANOL/ENGLISH:

Aida Thomas: e-mail: dianaclass8@yahoo.com

LOS ANGELES ex-SO STAFF ONLY:

contact Aida Thomas in private.

.

Silvia Kusada

.

Class VI (SHSBC), Class IV C/S and OT 8.

skusada2010@gmail.com

.

https://silviakusada.wordpress.com/my-story-in-short/

The happy world of the INDEPENDENT

as free people!!

.

.


 

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. Thanks for this post, I found it interesting . Makes me realise I should study more tech .


Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

  • January 2011
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec   Feb »
     12
    3456789
    10111213141516
    17181920212223
    24252627282930
    31  
  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 101 other followers