Shopping for bodies… or beings?
-I think I look good in that car… I meant to say: ‘with that girl!”-
I have mentioned before that whoever will actually
produce a true realistic human robot
will make a fortune.
I will definitely be one of the buyers.
May be I should audit-out giving up finding a mate.
I admit, I’m quite apathetic about it.
After few years of being single I decided to try one more time a single site.
I have done it 2-3 times… but after few days
I end up cancelling my subscription.
The only way I could be on one these programs longer than few days,
would be if I decide to write a book about dating.
I have to clarify that I do not believe into the so-called “womanhood” and “manhood”
I believe in spiritual being inhabiting bodies and acquiring and using the configuration, data, the ‘suppost-to’
or ‘not-suppost-to’ of that culture or that bodies.
So even if this post will mention men…
it is actually about men and women.
I have gone out with few guys… actually I would better say
I have gone out with many valences…
they are in too much fear to come out at the open.
When you read their profiles you read the description
of the most amazing perfect guys every woman would want to have.
A good 80% of the ones that promote themselves to have an income above $150.000 thoudands, are people who suddenly have ‘lost’ their job or lost the majority of their clients the day before they go out with you. Right!
Some others have moneys, they are too scared to reach for the blond ‘russian’ or the ‘too actractive’, and decide to go for something they can still kind of proud of to bring around (BRING), but they feel safer to not get screwed.
The so-called safe option.
Others are definitely wealthy but they do not know what manners are.
Or they think they do, because they buy you an expensive dinner,
they make sure you see they have spent $300 for that expensive wine
or they invite you in their house (what they call it ‘mansion’)
and they tell you to feel home, when they really mean:
‘If you stay with me you see what you can use?’
And you look at them, realizing
they do not have a clue of who you really are
and who they really are.
They are making their business deal.
My money, the use of my properties for your body…
if you make me look good and you shut up when I do not wish to talk.
I think if all this would be openly expressed
I would have more appreciation for the guys.
I grew up in a country where manners were very important.
And I still think they are.
They are a form of respect and care.
To say good night before going to sleep, to open the door to a woman,
to ask what she would like to eat or if there is anything you could do to make the person feel better or more confortable…
Manners are nothing more than a way to say:
‘I see you are here and I like it.’
I remember when I was teenager, a very beautiful friend of mine
slept with a guy just because he went to her
and told her she looked like a princess.
And he really treated her like one.
Wasn’t a big deal to sleep around but there was care,
it wasn’t a cold use of each other.
We were friends “forever” (kind of) after that.
I believe in love. I believe in honestly and loyalty.
But most of all I believe that when somebody really sees who you are,
if that is love, it does not ask himself what you can do for him,
it does not care of your past or your future,
he is not worried about his properties or the time he is investing.
Nothing of this counts.
And if it is pure love, an high tone one it will last forever.
A honeymoon can last a life time…
The question most people in fear ask themselves
women or men indistinctly is:
‘What he or she can do for me?”
But this is an incomplete question…
the second part should say… “and what does she /he needs ?
Can I deliver that to him/her?”
Two first dynamics
do not make a second dynamics.
They simply remain 2 first dynamics,
even if in appearance there is an illusion of a group.
The coexistence and the fusion of 2 first dynamics,
with a common goal
and a basic postulate of survival as a group
will make one.
You do not lose your individuality…
you just expanding into more space and more beigness,
that been the one of your teammate.
And you sit there with this super cool “well mannered guy”,
that just ate all the fish you supposed to share,
he did not even ask you if you wanted to try it,
he did not even think there is another person in front of him…
You sit there and wonder.
You well know this guy is not going to do anything for you,
unless it brings any benefit to hinself.
You are just one of the cars he wish to drive..
and he really does not care if he gets you or a yellow one,
as long as he gets a car.
It is a first dynamic activity.
There was a guy that thanked me for having accepted his invitation
where no women have had.
I wouldn’t have gone too if wasn’t for a misunderstanding,
but I was surely glad to be there, and I would have rather spent my time
with him that with the others Mr Right.
He was the only one to be really there…
A OT, to make it short, cannot play the meat body game
without going down..
he has to start lying to himself and justifying and saying good-bye to his awareness, abilities and Code of Honor…
It is true that for a being anything is better than nothing…
but that is true for a being that is already pretty enmeshed with the lies
in this universe… and have already lost the sense of truth
and his own integrity…
Compromises and justifications are the very essence of this universe.
and after a while they make you lose sight of what you really want
and of who you really are.
It is priceless to have spiritual friends. 😀
‘THE ELEMENTS with stress on how to run matched terminals
25 March 1953 by L. Ron Hubbard
“Any thinker in any age, any one of the great teachers has recognized this very clearly: that Man’s only smaller chance of bailing himself out of what he was in-the only chance he had of bailing out had to do with Man respecting Man and letting people get up off their knees.
And the six great teachers have each-has each one of them tried to make this point clear to Man.
Then a bunch of mad hatters rush in and they get down-you see, there can be one level at 40.0 where you really do get the universal solvent: admiration, affinity.
And for every point on the upper scale, there is an echo: mockery point on the lower scale.
For instance, true friendship could only exist from about, oh, maybe 2.8 up. And yet your friends at that level never say, “I’m your friend.”
That’s left for the fellows around 1.1.”
“People come along and they say “love”. (…)
“What is this stuff called love?”
“Everybody knows that men and women are in love with each other.
Oh, yeah? I know they have compulsive drive toward each other that’s very emotionally upsetting, … Well, maybe once in a while they do.
And when they do, do you see a tremendous successful marriage.”
“And as an auditor you are going to be confronted with this, time after time, because you are going to say, “Well, that’s odd.
This fellow was in love with this girl and then this happened and… “get that first word that he used. “I was in love.”
Right at that moment, take your choice.
It’s down here below 2.0 on the Tone Scale or it was way up.
And if it was way up, he wouldn’t be sitting there talking to you.
You get that? “
He wouldn’t be there if it was up, so what’s he talking about?
He’s talking to you about something which exists below 2.0 on the Tone Scale. (…)
Because there’s always something below 2.0 on the Tone Scale which is a mockery and a mimicry and a pretended agreement with something actual, high on the Tone Scale.
For instance, there-fear is a sort of enthusiasm.
You can watch somebody exhibiting enthusiasm and he’s coming out that way, you see?
Well, a person doing fear is really doing some sort of a level like that and you can very easily get a person who is continually in fear mixed up with a person who is enthusiastic.
You are dealing with somebody who’s about 1.0 on the Tone Scale and you think you’re dealing with a person who has a tremendous amount of enthusiasm.
Only, all this person is trying to do that has all this enthusiasm, he’s just trying to hold everything off of him. With what?
By being afraid of it, see?
Push out that outflow, push out that outflow and that will hold them all off. And you-this person very often will mistake this for enthusiasm.
And it’s merely this: it’s, if he can put it out fast enough and hard enough and acceptably enough, he drives them off hard enough.
So sometimes he’s more scared than others. “
“Love is a compound emotion. “
“If you want the preclear to turn on the emotion called “love,” get him to turn on sympathy and admiration in sequence.
Get him to turn on sympathy for something, then admiration for something, then sympathy for something, then admiration for something.
And if he gets that going, all of a sudden the sympathy and admiration will merge as an emotion and you’ll get what’s known as love.
And he will feel that and he’ll say,
“My God, I haven’t felt that since I was fifteen.”
That’s real love.”
“Of course, most people are so scared of this commodity that you probably wouldn’t be able to get them to admit it if they did feel it- if you get somebody, when you got him up the Tone Scale a little bit and try the test.
And what people misinterpret as love below 2.0 on the Tone Scale is a very low-tone agreement with.
It’s actually a sort of pity, feel sorry for, sympathize with.
In other words, it’s the sympathy.
It is the sympathy element in love.
And so you get it way down at the bottom of the tone scale.”
“It’s quite powerful. It doesn’t have the other ingredient in it: admiration. “
We talk about ARC and we’re always talking about affinity.
What’s affinity? Affinity is co-beigness.
And co-beigness is only possible in the presence of admiration and sympathy.
Now, it has to fall away from perfect co-beigness in order to pick up individual characteristics.
The universal solvent is affinity.”
The lower it is on the scale, the less co-beigness is possible.
So how do you get a preclear out of his body and able to be a lorry and able to be a soapbox and able to be anything he wants to be?
Well, boy, he’d better have affinity in unbounded quantities. “
“But if affinity was co-beigness, you wouldn’t need much space.
You really wouldn’t if you had affinity.
You wouldn’t have to be able to make very much space.
It wouldn’t be very important.
“We don’t have affinity creating a boundless quantity of space, but we have no-affinity with a tremendous insistence on lots of space.
And when a person says, “I don’t like,” he means, “I want to put space between me and it.”
Communication will be the ability to translate sympathy or some component of sympathy from one terminal to another terminal.
That would be communication. And the most perfect communication would be communication.
That would be the most perfect communication, you see.
You’d be in the same space as the other person, thinking the same thought, and that’s as perfect as communicating is going to get.
And the most perfect affinity you could possibly be with anybody was to be the body. Be them. That would be perfect affinity, you see?
But you’d really have to have perfect affinity in order to have perfect communication and yet…
All right. And then, then we’ve got reality. What’s perfect reality?
We’d have perfect reality as agreement, just like we’ve said all along, because the most perfect agreement would be to be in the same space with, thinking the same thought as and feeling the same emotion as somebody else. And then you and somebody else would be actually, basically, the same person.
But there is a position on the Tone Scale where you and somebody else could be the same person and then simply on determinism be different people?
You know, be the same person, then be other people?
And then be the same person and then be two people?”
“Could you do this?
Yup. Way up. Way up on the Tone Scale. That’s the way you do it.”
“So way up on the Tone Scale, there is no such thing as a hidden communication or a hidden influence.
You have co-beigness, co-communication, co-agreement, winding up in a reality with a tremendous flexibility of beigness and determinism, tremendous loose flexibility.
A person is as happy as he can be his entire environment, saying, “I’m not going to be that, I’m not going to be that,” you’ve got the stimulus-response mechanism which, to know more about, you should study in Book One.
by L. Ron Hubbard
WE ARE HERE FOR YOU!!
I do believe the lower bridge as LRH laid it out
is the right gradient to upper levels.
I have put my spiritual search and progress as the priority.
However, I’m available to get to Clear and OT ONLY, I underline,
ONLY those that are truly determined to make it out.
(those only can contact me at: Skusada2010@gmail.com)
All the others can avail of the many great people
and great auditors available in the field of earth.
WE ARE HERE TO HELP!!
If you need help to get out of the Church of $cientology
or if you just left and need help, please call or write to:
ITALIANO/ENGLISH: e-mail: SKusada2010@gmail.com
ESPANOL/ENGLISH: e-mail: email@example.com
Class VI (SHSBC), Class IV C/S and OT 8.