Have you ever wondered why
there is always a new course or rundown
that you had/have to do
before continuing on the Grade Chart?
Another mandatory action?!?$#@!
PTS SP course, Volunteer minister course,
the Basics, Dianetics auditor Course
Now The New Efficiency Course etc..
and on the other side…
the L’s, PTS rundown, False Purpose Rundown, Sec Checks…
Great Courses and fantastic auditing
but some of them are for new people,
others are to get people, who had wandered off,
onto the Bridge.
Definitely those are not steps
to be enforced on people
that have been on lines, active for years…
This is a way to keep you off the real stuff.
This is the definition of NO AUDITING
as, without the steps on the Grade Chard,
you are NOT handling the right charge to go up…
...
.
“The exact subjects a pc must be released on
in order to make it up the bridge
are those listed on the Grade Chart.”
“Overrun occurs when the thetan considers
that something has gone on too long or happened too often.”
“When the person begins to feel this way about something,
he begins to protest it and try to stop it.”
… In life when something is overrun,
the person begins to accumulate protests and upsets
about the thing or activity he feels overrun on.
His attention tends to stick on it.
This also build up mass.
…
“REHAB TECH” HCOB 19 Dec 1980R Rev 16 Nov 1987
…
And then the suppression continues,
When you have the courage to disagree,
or when naturally your upsets come up
...
you get punished with more sec checks and ethics cycles
because if you are getting upset it means
(to the Church of $cientology)
you have overts and withholds.
It has become a suppressive introverting trap.
You now have a way out that insanity.
Many people are getting up the bridge
in the independent field all around the world.
1000's of people are waking up to the abuses and lies of the current Church of $cientology and escaping their trap... encountering freedom just out the door!
.
GREAT NEWS:
.
Success
I finally said “That’s It!”
.
.
____________________________
We are here to help!!
If you are still in the church as staff or as public
and you need help to get out,
if you just left and you need help,
please call or write to:
ITALIANO/ENGLISH:
Silvia Kusada e-mail: SKusada2010@gmail.com
ESPANOL/ENGLISH:
Aida Thomas: e-mail: dianaclass8@yahoo.com
LOS ANGELES ex-SO STAFF ONLY:
contact Aida Thomas in private.
.
Silvia Kusada
.
Class VI (SHSBC), Class IV C/S and OT 8.
skusada2010@gmail.com
.
https://silviakusada.wordpress.com/my-story-in-short/
…
The happy world of the INDEPENDENT as free people!!
http://www.facebook.com/video/video.php?v=1589940262671&ref=mf
…
….
2 Comments
Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI
– a CENTER FOR SPIRITUAL RESEARCH and ITS APPLICATIONS (Solo auditors wins and more…)
– AIDA THOMAS BLOG: The world class awarded OT and Class VIII
– ANTONY PHILLIPS: stories from an old timer
– DAVID ST LAWRENCE: Including what we found in Scientology before it became a cult
– ITALIANO: il BLOG ITALIANO di Ri
Spiritual Rescue Technology by David St Lawrence
Advanced Spiritual Research's BLOG 
Dear Silvia,
Thank You so very much for your Thanksgiving THETA BOMB!
It’s mutual.
Re the blog subject of today, Nov. 23, No auditing. I am redoing the Study Tapes, and here LRH gives more on the same subject. On the tape 4 August 1964, A summary of study, there are gems to share.
The whole tape hits this subject, but here just two of the paragraphs:
“Now, you can err to the degree that you’re giving him a subject which he’s never going to do. Now, let’s take it over into Scientology. You’re giving him all the data, necessary to run Standard Operating Procedure of July, Elizabeth, New Jersey and so forth. And the mistake is to give him all of it. He’s never going to use it.
”All you want to know—all you want to give him is enough so he can identify it. If he collides with this thing again, he said, ”Hey, that’s Standard Operating Procedure of July,” you know, ”back there, Elizabeth.” ”Early days, Elizabeth,” is about all you want to get through there. ”Yeah, that sort of thing. Finger snap, yeah.” Something like that. ”Oh, yes. They did that, early days.” Have some dim idea where this thing fits, you see? That’s about all you want to get across to him. He’s not going to do it, see? So therefore, if he’s not going to do it, you’ve got to strip the significance off of it. You got the idea? That’s the way these are kept in balance. If the guy isn’t going to do it, take the significance off of it. See, you’ve got to keep these things in balance. If he’s going to do it, pour it to him, man!
And: “So we come to the conclusion that the doingness and the mass of a subject are the current, applicable and useful doingnesses and masses of the subject and those are what should be taught—hard. They’re applicable, the applicable doingnesses and masses. In other words, the student should be taught what the student is going to be doing. And the significances that should be taught to the student don’t compare to what I just told you. The significances are enough background so as not to get—and this is something they’ve all missed, and this is how an engineer gets to be forty years old and goes old hat—is enough significance so that he doesn’t get stuck in the mechanical doingness he’s been taught—and you’ve got to give him enough significance. In other words, that’s a little bit more significance than you would expect to give him. And that’s why you give him the history of it, to show that it was developed and give him some sketch of its development. And that’s why you show him how the thing evolved and what the doingnesses of it were.
So you see, it becomes asinine to make him do these old things. You’re just trying to show him that there were some other doingnesses, don’t you see? And you’re making him conversant with the principles with which he’s operating and if he’s sufficiently conversant with those, then the doingness and the other action which he is being taught don’t become obsolete because he can think, see? And that’s the difference between a pro—that’s the difference between a ”pro” and a ”practical man.” It shows up quite additionally, is a pro always does it by the textbook, with a difference; always does it by the textbook, a bit better. And when the thing shifts, it doesn’t look like a shift to him, it looks like simply the same thing with its face slightly shifted. Do you see? It doesn’t look all that brassy new.”
This instead of what dear DM is pushing…
Which also prevents training on the Bridge, and co-auditing as well.
You are so spot on: DMs product is no auditing!
ML,
RM
hello I was luck to seek your website in bing
your post is wonderful
I learn much in your website really thank your very much
btw the theme of you blog is really marvelous
where can find it